COST vs WMT
Bulk and big-box retail. Compare price, valuation, growth, profitability, and balance-sheet quality — all in one view.
Highlighted values indicate the better reading for that metric, where direction is unambiguous. Lower is generally better for valuation multiples and leverage; higher is better for growth, margin, and cash-flow metrics. Educational data only, not investment advice.
Related comparisons
Next research paths
Open the full COST stock page with chart, fundamentals, FAQ, and news context.
Open the full WMT stock page with chart, fundamentals, FAQ, and news context.
Check the next earnings date and reporting history for COST.
Move from side-by-side comparison into open desk notes and live market context.
COST vs WMT — common questions
Is COST or WMT the better stock?
Across the valuation, growth, and profitability metrics compared on this page, WMT shows the stronger reading on more of them (8 vs 5). A metric tally is not a recommendation — the right pick depends on your time horizon and risk tolerance.
Which is bigger, COST or WMT?
WMT has the larger market capitalization — COST is about $422.43B versus $920.67B for WMT.
Which grows faster, COST or WMT?
COST shows the faster year-over-year revenue growth — COST at 21.5% versus 7.3% for WMT.
Is COST or WMT cheaper?
On forward price-to-earnings, WMT trades at the lower multiple — COST at 42.1x versus 35.2x for WMT.
What is the difference between COST and WMT?
Costco Wholesale Corporation operates in the Consumer Defensive sector, while Walmart Inc. operates in the Consumer Defensive sector. This page compares the two across price, valuation multiples, growth, margins, and balance-sheet quality.
Go deeper than a side-by-side.
Add COST and WMT to your Meridian watchlist for live alerts, AI-driven setups, and full earnings coverage.